2005: Retirement Legislation

 

The Complete History of the Nebraska Tax Equity
and Educational Opportunities Support Act (TEEOSA)
Policy History Navigation

 


Retirement Legislation

LB 503 (2005) embodied a number of technical and substantive changes to several state sponsored public employees retirement plans. ;nbsp;Under the School Employees Retirement System, the four major provisions of the legislation included: ;nbsp;(1) an increase in the contribution rate; (2) provisions concerning salary spiking; (3) school reporting of salary information; and (4) provisions for a temporary spending lid exclusion. ;nbsp;It was the latter of these provisions that impacted the state aid formula.

Contribution Rate

In order to address a $14.9 million actuarial shortfall, LB 503 raised the contribution rate under the School Employees Retirement System for a period of two years. ;nbsp;The prior employee contribution rate was set at 7.25% with an employer rate of 7.32% (automatically set at 101% of the employee rate). ;nbsp;LB 503 caused the rates to change as follows:

Effective September 1, 2005 to August 31, 2006:

  • Employee: ;nbsp;7.98%
  • Employer: ;nbsp;8.06%

Effective September 1, 2006 to August 31, 2007:

  • Employee: ;nbsp;7.83%
  • Employer: ;nbsp;7.91%1
Document Archive
LB 503: Retirement legislation
 
Bill Summary Statement of Intent
Chronology Hearing Transcripts
Com. Statement Exec. Session Votes
Introduced Bill Slip Law
 
Fiscal Notes:;nbsp;;nbsp; Feb. 1, 2005
;nbsp; Feb. 25, 2005
;nbsp; Mar. 1, 2005
;nbsp; Apr. 12, 2005
 
Floor Transcripts:;nbsp;;nbsp; ;nbsp;
General File;nbsp;;nbsp; Feb. 16, 2005
Select File;nbsp;;nbsp; Feb. 25, 2005
Final Reading;nbsp;;nbsp; Apr. 11, 2005
;nbsp; Apr. 22, 2005

The actuarial shortfall, so called because the state actuary determined that additional contributions were necessary to maintain a financially sound system, was due largely to the economic problems faced by the nation in the previous three years.

An increase in the contribution rates has obvious implications for local school systems in terms of what the schools are willing to settle during teacher contract negotiations. ;nbsp;For school boards, it means additional expenditures to pay for that portion of employee benefits. ;nbsp;For teachers and other school employees, it could mean less take home pay.

Salary Spiking

Prior to the 2005 Session, the School Employees Retirement System utilized what was commonly referred to as the "10% rule." ;nbsp;Under this rule, the amount of compensation that may be counted toward retirement for each plan member was capped at 10% growth from the previous year. ;nbsp;The rule did not limit the amount a school board may pay an employee, but it did limit the amount a plan member may count toward retirement. ;nbsp;The 10% rule applied to each year of membership prior to actual retirement.

There were two exceptions to the rule: ;nbsp;(1) if the member experienced a substantial change in employment position; or (2) if the excess compensation occurred as the result of a collective bargaining agreement between the employer and a recognized collective-bargaining unit or category of school employee. ;nbsp;The latter of these two exceptions applied to teachers in particular.2

One of the policy issues addressed by LB 503 was that the existing 10% rule simply did not curb the problem of salary spiking by school employees, which sometimes occurred in the last few years of employment prior to retirement. ;nbsp;There was some question about the extent of this problem, but there had been several pieces of legislation introduced to address the real or perceived issue. ;nbsp;In 2004, the Legislature's Retirement Committee introduced LB 1081 to amend existing law to include the false or fraudulent reporting of compensation received that includes amounts not defined as compensation for purposes of the School Employees Retirement Act.3 ;nbsp;LB 1081 was never advanced from committee, but it did lead to an interim study to address the issue. ;nbsp;The subsequent study led to the introduction of LB 411 in the 2005 Session, the contents of which were absorbed into LB 503.4

To address salary spiking, LB 503 put into place a similar system used in other states to limit the amount of salary increase counted toward retirement. ;nbsp;Beginning July 1, 2005, LB 503 implemented what might be loosely called a "floating cap" to determine compensation for purposes of retirement. ;nbsp;In the determination of compensation for members on or after July 1, 2005, LB 503 implemented an annual compensation cap of 7% (for purposes of the retirement plan) for each of the last five years (60 months) of employment prior to actual retirement. ;nbsp;This does not preclude an increase in compensation greater than 7%, but no more than 7% would be counted toward calculation of retirement benefits in each of the last five years of employment.5

There are three exceptions to the new cap, and one of these exceptions gives rise to the rationale for calling it a "floating cap." ;nbsp;The first exception is consistent with that under previous law: ;nbsp;the member experienced a substantial change in employment position. ;nbsp;The second exception is a modified version of previous law in that the 7% cap would not apply to employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement between the employer and a recognized collective-bargaining unit or category of school employee. ;nbsp;The twist in this modified exception is that, if the collective bargaining agreement arrives at an average compensation increase in excess of 7%, that percentage would also apply to employees not covered by the collective bargaining agreement (e.g., school administrators). ;nbsp;The third exception applies to compensation increases in excess of 7% due to a district-wide permanent benefit change made by the employer for a category of school employee.6

School Reporting

In order to assist the Nebraska Public Employees Retirement Systems (the Retirement Agency) in monitoring salary information from school employees, LB 503 also requires school districts to report each occurrence of an employee's compensation exceeding 7% of the previous year's compensation. ;nbsp;The "self-reporting" provision requires the employer district to report such information within 90 days of the end of the plan year. ;nbsp;The Retirement Agency would maintain this information in order to assist the administration of the floating 7% cap under LB 503.7

Spending Lid Exclusion

On April 11, 2005, Senator Ron Raikes succeeded in a motion to return LB 503 to Select File for specific amendment.8 ;nbsp;The Legislature subsequently adopted Senator Raikes' proposed amendment to LB 503 concerning a temporary spending lid exception for the amount of the contribution increase born by employer districts. ;nbsp;The spending lid exception would apply only to the 2005-06 and 2006-07 school fiscal years. ;nbsp;The current employer contribution rate was set at 7.32% of employee salaries. ;nbsp;LB 503 would raise the employer rate to 8.06% for 2005-06 and a slightly lower rate of 7.91% for 2006-07. ;nbsp;The employer rate would automatically return to the 7.32% rate beginning in 2007-08, at which time the spending lid exception would automatically sunset.9

Table 174. ;nbsp;Employer Contribution Rate Changes/Amount
of Spending Lid Exclusion under LB 503 (2005)*

Current
2004-05
Rate
Rate for
2005-06
Difference
from 2004-05
Rate
Rate for
2006-07
Difference
from 2004-05
Rate
;nbsp;
7.32% 8.06% .74% 7.91% .59%
;nbsp;
* The provision applies only to the spending lid and not the levy limitation.

Source: ;nbsp;Legislative Bill 503, in Laws of Nebraska, Ninety-Ninth Legislature, First Session, 2005, Session Laws, comp. Patrick J. O'Donnell, Clerk of the Legislature (Lincoln, Nebr.: by authority of John Gale, Secretary of State), § 11, pp. 9-10 (926-27).



Table 175. ;nbsp;Summary of Modifications to TEEOSA
as per LB 503 (2005)

Bill
Sec.
Statute
Sec.
Revised
Catch Line
Description of Change
11 79-1028 Applicable allowable growth rate; Class II, III, IV, V, or VI district may exceed; situations enumerated For 2005-06, a Class II-VI district may exceed its applicable allowable growth rate by a specific dollar amount not to exceed .74% of the amount budgeted for employee salaries for such school fiscal year. For 2006-07, a Class II-VI district may exceed its applicable allowable growth rate by a specific dollar amount not to exceed .59% of the amount budgeted for employee salaries for such school fiscal year.

Source: ;nbsp;Legislative Bill 503, in Laws of Nebraska, Ninety-Ninth Legislature, First Session, 2005, Session Laws, comp. Patrick J. O'Donnell, Clerk of the Legislature (Lincoln, Nebr.: by authority of John Gale, Secretary of State), § 11, pp. 9-10 (926-27).


1 Legislative Bill 503, in Laws of Nebraska, Ninety-Ninth Legislature, First Session, 2005, Session Laws, comp. Patrick J. O'Donnell, Clerk of the Legislature (Lincoln, Nebr.: by authority of John Gale, Secretary of State), § 10, p. 9 (926).
2 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-902(35)(c) (Cum. Supp. 2003).
3 Legislative Bill 1081, Change provisions relating to false or fraudulent actions under the School Employees Retirement Act, sponsored by Nebraska Retirement Systems Committee, Nebraska Legislature, 98th Leg., 2nd Sess., 2004, title first read 14 January 2004, §§ 1-3, pp. 2-4.
4 Legislative Bill 411, Change calculations for school employee retirement, sponsored by Sen. Elaine Stuhr, Nebraska Legislature, 99th Leg., 1st Sess., 2005, title first read 12 January 2005, §§ 1-4, pp. 2-14.
5 LB 503, Session Laws, 2005, § 8, pp. 4-8 (921-25).
6 Id., § 8, pp. 4-8 (921-25).
7 Id., § 9, p. 8 (925). ;nbsp;This particular provision was amended by LB 364 (2005) to change the number of days from 30 to 90 and to make other changes in the provisions of LB 503.
8 Neb. Legis. Journal, Raikes AM1046, 11 April 2005, 1167.
9 LB 503, Session Laws, 2005, § 11, pp. 9-10 (926-27).

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

;nbsp;

 

Coming soon...

Coming soon...

Who benefits from this website?

  • All students of school finance
  • Policymakers
  • School administrators
  • School board members
  • Teachers
  • Parents
  • Graduate students


We welcome your feedback concerning this site.

Stay in Touch!

NCSA Text Alerts

#NCSAmike, #NCSAdan

Like the NCSA FB page